• Hello Guest! Welcome to ConsoleCrunch, to help support our site check out the premium upgrades HERE! to get exclusive access to our hidden content.
  • Unable to load portions of the website...
    If you use an ad blocker addon, you should disable it because it interferes with several elements of the site and blocks more than just adverts.
  • Read Rules Before Posting Post Virus Scans with every program.

Refugee Poll

Should the U.S, UK and Europe accept refugees from the Middle East/Syria?

  • Yes

    Votes: 2 20.0%

  • No

    Votes: 8 80.0%
  • Total voters
    10
Arrogant said:
Should the U.S, UK and Europe accept refugees from the Middle East/Syria?
Yes or No?
Give your Reason/Opinion
Personally i believe we shouldn't as the UK is overcrowded already. The government need to start prioritizing British Citizens.
Click to expand...
Same for the US. Overcrowded and economy is bad.
 
The veterans need to be housed first (millions homeless). Why destroy their homes and tell them to come to our country? When we can't even house the people that protected us.
 
YoshiApocalypse said:
The veterans need to be housed first (millions homeless). Why destroy their homes and tell them to come to our country? When we can't even house the people that protected us.
Click to expand...
Our governments seem to like punishing people who have fought for there country and added to the economy. The whole refugee crisis scene is just a hoax, an excuse so anyone from Syria can get a free pass to enter the UK or any luxurious country of there choice. No genuine refugees come to the UK or the US. England is a christian country, and the Syrians are fully aware they will get benefits/advantages if they come here hence why they do. Most Syrians are Muslim and have the same beliefs as citizens of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is a wealthy huge country who haven't taken in many refugees. But why is that? Why don't they go to Saudi Arabia? Why go to Saudi Arabia when you can go the UK and England and get treated better than British citizens? Have you seen how many safe countries they travel through to get to the UK? They travel all the way through Europe just to come to this island. Refugees seek safety, not luxury. Therefore these people coming to the UK are not genuine refugees. Nobody "should" do anything, fed up with that "We're all humans we should be treated the same" bullshit. People are afraid to say no as if you say no your accused of being racist/nationalist etc...
 
Arrogant said:
Our governments seem to like punishing people who have fought for there country and added to the economy. The whole refugee crisis scene is just a hoax, an excuse so anyone from Syria can get a free pass to enter the UK or any luxurious country of there choice. No genuine refugees come to the UK or the US. England is a christian country, and the Syrians are fully aware they will get benefits/advantages if they come here hence why they do. Most Syrians are Muslim and have the same beliefs as citizens of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is a wealthy huge country who haven't taken in many refugees. But why is that? Why don't they go to Saudi Arabia? Why go to Saudi Arabia when you can go the UK and England and get treated better than British citizens? Have you seen how many safe countries they travel through to get to the UK? They travel all the way through Europe just to come to this island. Refugees seek safety, not luxury. Therefore these people coming to the UK are not genuine refugees. Nobody "should" do anything, fed up with that "We're all humans we should be treated the same" bullshit. People are afraid to say no as if you say no your accused of being racist/nationalist etc...
Click to expand...


This is some real $hit #Arrogant4President
 
YoshiApocalypse said:
I do to that's why I started a us presidential debate thread.
Click to expand...
Yeah i saw that. Actually, your thread is the reason why i started this poll. Don't really know much about American politics, but all i know is Donald Trump will win it :)
 
Arrogant said:
Yeah i saw that. Actually, your thread is the reason why i started this poll. Don't really know much about American politics, but all i know is Donald Trump will win it :)
Click to expand...

Sadly he has a huge chance
 
Arrogant said:
I agree with some of the things he says, but not all. He also lies a lot, he claims he will make Mexico pay for the wall somehow.
Click to expand...


I see why people support him but he's to radical for me. He supports killing of terroist families. He supports nuclear warfare and he also supports torcherment. (I disagree with all)
 
This post was very intresting to read i would love to see more like this and find out more about your opions i think you should post more of these a lot more often
 
UntiedModz said:
This post was very intresting to read i would love to see more like this and find out more about your opions i think you should post more of these a lot more often
Click to expand...
Thank you.
Yes, i am planning on posting more debates like this so this website is associated with many different topics rather than just PS3 modding :)
 
Arrogant said:
Should the U.S, UK and Europe accept refugees from the Middle East/Syria?
Yes or No?
Give your Reason/Opinion
Personally i believe we shouldn't as the UK is overcrowded already. The government need to start prioritizing British Citizens.
Click to expand...
First of all the UK attacked their country and destroyed their home, so under international law they must take in refugees. I know there needs to be a limit on refugees but the UK have already closed the border on them thats why they are waiting at Calais.

Also you have to think who funded ISIS, the UK and US funded the moderates in Syria, who are the moderates rebels (What does moderates mean? Do they eat half the body?)

 
Younis said:
First of all the UK attacked their country and destroyed their home, so under international law they must take in refugees. I know there needs to be a limit on refugees but the UK have already closed the border on them thats why they are waiting at Calais.

Also you have to think who funded ISIS, the UK and US funded the moderates in Syria, who are the moderates rebels (What does moderates mean? Do they eat half the body?)

Click to expand...
We didn't destroy anyone's homes. That's just what the media tell people just so you gain sympathy for them. There country is at Civil war and we bombed the East side of Syria where ISIS are located. Our airstrikes have been successful, we have killed many jihadists in them such as Jihadi John etc... We don't have to take any "refugees" in at all. What kind of Refugee travels all the way through Europe to get to the UK? If it was the other way round, and ISIS were located in the UK and i became a refugee i wouldn't go to Syria just to get safety, i would go to somewhere close such as France after all i am seeking safety. We shouldn't take in any "refugees" at all. We don't even know who these people are and we are just letting them into our country for free. Also, i believe the US do fund terrorist organizations but i don't think the UK do. We have nowhere near as much money and arsenal as the US do. I have heard a few people say that they believe the US is funding ISIS to cause a Refugee crisis on purpose to destabilize Europe.
 
Younis said:
First of all the UK attacked their country and destroyed their home, so under international law they must take in refugees. I know there needs to be a limit on refugees but the UK have already closed the border on them that's why they are waiting at Calais.

Also, you have to think who funded ISIS, the UK and US funded the moderates in Syria, who are the moderates rebels (What does moderates mean? Do they eat half the body?)

Click to expand...


The way I view it is that they should be protected not live in luxury with no worries. They shouldn't get all benefits as an American or a UK citizen they should have an opportunity to become successful financially and go back to their home country (idk if you have green cards in EU) once it gets repaired and corrected. All of the words greatest powers (USA, Germany, china, Russia, japan, UK, Saudi Arabia) been affected by these terrorist groups and should help the innocent and defeat the terrorist and put some order in the middle east.


edit there shouldn't be only a few country major countries (us, uk, Australia)
 
Arrogant said:
We didn't destroy anyone's homes. That's just what the media tell people just so you gain sympathy for them. There country is at Civil war and we bombed the East side of Syria where ISIS are located. Our airstrikes have been successful, we have killed many jihadists in them such as Jihadi John etc... We don't have to take any "refugees" in at all. What kind of Refugee travels all the way through Europe to get to the UK? If it was the other way round, and ISIS were located in the UK and i became a refugee i wouldn't go to Syria just to get safety, i would go to somewhere close such as France after all i am seeking safety. We shouldn't take in any "refugees" at all. We don't even know who these people are and we are just letting them into our country for free. Also, i believe the US do fund terrorist organizations but i don't think the UK do. We have nowhere near as much money and arsenal as the US do. I have heard a few people say that they believe the US is funding ISIS to cause a Refugee crisis on purpose to destabilize Europe.
Click to expand...
The UK did the airstrikes illegally, they didn't ask the Syrian government, they invaded their airspace. Off course the Syrian government knows where ISIS held territory is, why didn't the UK ask him. Instead of bombing the Syrian army who are fighting ISIS.

Russia did ask the Syrian government and Asaad called Russia for help. The real reason why they want Asaad gone is because he is Anti-Zionist.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      Chat Bot: QM|T_JinX has joined the room.
      Back
      Top